Cases 1 - 4 of 4
United States of America v. Sellers
as 2:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John Wesley Sellers, III
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 853 Forfeiture Property - Firearms
United States of America v. All of the sellers rights, title and interests in the land and appurtenances located at 605 North 5th Avenue, Caldwell, Canyon County, Idaho, being parcel number 019660000 et al
as 1:2016cv00380
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
All of the sellers rights, title and interests in the land and appurtenances located at 605 North 5th Avenue, Caldwell, Canyon County, Idaho, being parcel number 019660000 and All of the sellers rights, title and interests in the Promissory Note in the amount of $230,000, in favor of Rogelio and Etelvina Villasenor, and the Deed of Trust
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. 817,426.12 SEIZED FROM BANCORP BANK ACCOUNT XXXXXX0651 et al
as 3:2016cv00633
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
817,426.12 SEIZED FROM BANCORP BANK ACCOUNT XXXXXX0651, 872,570.79 SEIZED FROM BANCORP BANK ACCOUNT XXXXXX6758, 224,705.03 SEIZED FROM COINBASE ACCOUNT XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX000AD and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 983
United States of America v. $10,587.61 seized from Vystar Credit Union checking account XXXXXX1126, held in the name of Paul Crandall and Kelly Crandall et al
as 3:2014cv01495
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$10,587.61 seized from Vystar Credit Union checking account XXXXXX1126, held in the name of Paul Crandall and Kelly Crandall , $57,308.33 seized from Bank of America checking account XXXXXXXX0371, held in the name of Paul Crandall sole proprietor DBA Power Seller Professionals and $60,165.45 seized from TD Ameritrade account number XXXXX7084, held in the names of Kelly Crandall, Paul Crandall and Mary Crandall
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
