Cases 1 - 10 of 17
(PC) Jones v. Shute et al
as 2:2022cv01384
Plaintiff:
Marcell Jones
Defendant:
Michelle Shute, Traci Patterson and CDCR Healthcare Admin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
792 Individual Consumers v. Intuit Inc.
as 3:2022cv02486
Plaintiff:
792 Individual Consumers, Brandie Stifel, Brandie Nielson and others
Defendant:
Intuit Inc.
Petitioner:
April Hudock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Harrison et al v. Kang et al
as 3:2020cv02961
Defendant:
Yujing Chen, Suting Kang and Shuting Kang
Plaintiff:
Sophie Harrison and Jarrod Lee Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
(PC) Spillard v. Costa et al
as 2:2020cv00705
Plaintiff:
Everett L. Spillard, II
Defendant:
Bick, Lvn Umanah, Costa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Spillard v. Costa et al
as 2:2020cv00702
Plaintiff:
Everett L. Spillard, II
Defendant:
Bick, Kethinel, Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KANG v. Harrison et al
as 4:2018cv05398
Plaintiff:
SHUTING KANG
Defendant:
Sophie Harrison, Jarrod Harrison and Shengrun International Industry Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kang v. Harrison et al
as 3:2018cv05399
Plaintiff:
SHUTING KANG
Defendant:
Sophie Harrison, Jarrod Harrison and Shengrun International Industry Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Shuting Kang v. Harrison et al
as 3:2017cv03034
Defendant:
Sophie Harrison, Shengrun International Industry Group, Inc. and SINO-USA Entrepreneur Association, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shuting Kang
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Shuting Kang v. Harrison et al
as 4:2017cv03034
Counter Defendant:
SHUTING KANG
Defendant:
Sophie Harrison, Shengrun International Industry Group, Inc., SINO-USA Entrepreneur Association, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
