Cases 1 - 10 of 17
SOKOL v. TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC. et al
as 2:2022cv06986
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II)
Plaintiff:
STACY SOKOL
Defendant:
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERICA, INC., TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS, INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC., and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
IRWIN v. TYME TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 3:2022cv04727
Plaintiff:
JAMES IRWIN
Defendant:
TYME TECHNOLOGIES, INC., DOUGLAS A. MICHELS, CHRISTINE D. BAKER and others
SOKOL v. WALMART, INC et al
as 3:2022cv04438
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA SOKOL
Defendant:
WALMART, INC, ABC COMPANY (1-10) and JOHN DOE (1-10)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv16758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv08437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SHALA v. DIMORA RISTORANTE, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv03064
Plaintiff:
DUKAGJIN SHALA
Defendant:
DIMORA RISTORANTE, INC., SOKOL GJEVUKAJ, ARJANIT GJEVUKAJ and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv07322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv07313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MCCRAY v. UNITE HERE et al
as 1:2013cv06540
Plaintiff:
EMANUEL MCCRAY
Defendant:
UNITE HERE, UNITE HERE GENERAL EXECUTIVE BOARD, UNITE HERE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
