Cases filed in the Federal Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Goode v. Cook
as 23-2023
Plaintiff / Appellant: JASON GOODE
Defendant / Appellee: ROLLIN COOK, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Correction, in his official and individual capacities, SCOTT SEMPLE, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Correction, Retired, in his individual capacity, WILLIAM JOSEPH MURPHY, Director, Programs and Treatment Division, Connecticut Department of Correction, in his official and individual capacities and others
HLFIP Holding, Inc. v. York County, PA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1940
Plaintiff / Appellant: HLFIP HOLDING, INC., dba Smart Communications IP Holdings
Defendant / Appellee: YORK COUNTY, PA, YORK COUNTY PRISON and ADAM OGLE, in his official capacity as York County Prison Warden
SHOCKLEY V FOX We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1063
Plaintiff-Appellant: Antoine Shockley
Defendant-Appellee: Dr. Antonio Villasan, Harrell Watts, National Inmate Appeals Administrator, John Fox, Warden and others
IN RE UPTON We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-M955
Respondent: Aref Fakhoury, Warden of California Institute for Men, Aref Fakhoury, Warden of California Institute for Men, Aref Fakhoury, Warden of California Institute for Men and others
Petitioner: David Upton, David Upton, David Upton and others
WILCOX V MORGAN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1340
Respondent-Appellee: James L. Morgan, Warden
Petitioner-Appellant: Norbert Steven Wilcox
JUDD V FOX
as 08-1593
Defendant-Appellee: John B. Fox, Warden
JUDD V RICHARDSON
as 08-1362
Defendant-Appellee: Francisco J. Quintana, Warden of Beaumont - Low
JUDD V FOX
as 08-1275
Defendant-Appellee: John B. Fox, Warden
JUDD V FOX
as 08-1064
Defendant-Appellee: John B. Fox, Warden
JUDD V FOX
as 08-1065
Defendant-Appellee: John B. Fox, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?