Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Rover Pipeline LLC v. 1.23 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, PERMANENT EASEMENT (PIPELINE RIGHT-OF-WAY SERVITUDE), AND 3.74 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, TEMPORARY WORK SPACE, IN LENAWEE COUNTY, MICHIGAN, Office of the Lenawee C et al
as 2:2017cv10365
Defendant:
1.23 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, PERMANENT EASEMENT (PIPELINE RIGHT-OF-WAY SERVITUDE), AND 3.74 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, TEMPORARY WORK SPACE, IN LENAWEE COUNTY, MICHIGAN, Office of the Lenawee C, 2.14 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, PERMANENT EASEMENT (PIPELINE RIGHT-OF-WAY SERVITUDE), AND 4.53 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, TEMPORARY WORK SPACE, IN LENAWEE COUNTY, MICHIGAN, Waterland Farms, LLC Tr, Michael P. Croghan and others
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Intervenor Defendant:
RSG Development LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 0.27 Acres of Land, More or Less et al
as 1:2010cv00274
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
0.27 Acres of Land, More or Less, Federico Lopez and Leocadia Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 0.27 ACRES OF LAND, more or less, situated in STARR COUNTY, STATE OF TEXAS et al
as 7:2008cv00249
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
0.27 ACRES OF LAND, more or less, situated in STARR COUNTY, STATE OF TEXAS, Encarnacion J. Rodriguez, Fidela O. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 0.27 Acres of Land, More or Less et al
as 1:2008cv00352
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
0.27 Acres of Land, More or Less, Jovita Barrera, Erasmo Barrera and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 0.27 ACRE OF LAND, more or less, et al
as 1:2008cv00301
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
0.27 ACRE OF LAND, more or less,, Maria L. Shuler, Delia Weaver and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
