Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Punch v. Webber et al
as 4:2023cv03071
Plaintiff:
Yolanda A Punch
Defendant:
Jeff Webber and 21st Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers et al v. 21st Mortgage Corporation
as 1:2022cv00311
Counter Defendant:
Michael Rogers and Joyce Rogers
Plaintiff:
a and Mickle Rogers
Defendant:
21st Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Ian Heatley et al v. Cavalier Homes, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv02939
Plaintiff:
Ian Heatley and Diane Heatley
Defendant:
Cavalier Homes, Inc., Tiny Homes of Texas, Inc., Roadmasters Transport Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Guerra v. 21st Mortgage Corporation
as 5:2021cv00099
Plaintiff:
Rene R. Guerra
Defendant:
21st Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dixon v. 21st Mortgage Corporation et al
as 6:2020cv00090
Plaintiff:
Wanda Dixon and John Dixon, Jr.
Defendant:
21st Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dixon v. 21st Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00059
Plaintiff:
Wanda Dixon and John Dixon, Jr.
Defendant:
21st Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guzman, et al v. 21st Mortgage Corporation, et al
as 5:2019cv00316
Defendant:
Richard McKinney and 21st Mortgage Corporation
Plaintiff:
Bertha Guzman and Ruben Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Pyle et al v. 21st Mortgage Corporation
as 6:2019cv00094
Plaintiff:
Jerry Pyle and Tanya Pyle
Defendant:
21st Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv04505
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
21st Mortgage Corporation v. Clark et al
as 5:2017cv00826
Plaintiff:
21st Mortgage Corporation
Defendant:
April Clark, Jeffery Clark and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
