Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Payne v. 3M Company et al
as 5:2017cv00134
Plaintiff:
Noah Payne
Defendant:
3M Company , Pangborn Corporation , Clemco Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Airey v. A.O. Smith Water Products Co. et al
as 1:2016cv00317
Plaintiff:
Beatrice H. Airey
Defendant:
A.O. Smith Water Products Co. , Ingersoll-Rand Company, General Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Pechon v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2016cv00116
Plaintiff:
Louis Pechon, Jr.
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Colon v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2016cv00115
Plaintiff:
Wayne Colon
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rhymes v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2015cv00363
Plaintiff:
Gary C. Rhymes
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bourne v. 3M Company et al
as 5:2014cv00074
Plaintiff:
Arthur Ray Bourne
Defendant:
3M Company, Pangborn Corporation, Clark Sand Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Confer et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2014cv00069
Plaintiff:
Edward Confer and Ginger Confer
Defendant:
3M Company, Georgia-Pacific, LLC , Honeywell International Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Booth v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2014cv00025
Plaintiff:
Henry Booth
Defendant:
3M Company , Specialty Sand Company , Lone Star Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mealer et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2013cv00175
Plaintiff:
Ruby Jean Mealer and Michael Gene Mealer
Defendant:
3M Company , Pangborn Corporation, Clark Sand Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Bryant v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2013cv00104
Plaintiff:
Ernest Bryant
Defendant:
3M Company , Specialty Sand Company, Lone Star Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
