Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Appalachian Voices, et al v. FERC
as 26-1100
Petitioner:
Appalachian Voices, Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, 7 Directions of Service and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, Duke Energy Progress, LLC, South Carolina Public Service Authority and others
Amicus Curiae:
Interstate Natural Gas Association of America
Sierra Club v. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
as 26-1044
Petitioner:
SIERRA CLUB, APPALACHIAN VOICES and 7 DIRECTIONS OF SERVICE
Respondent:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, D. REID WILSON, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality and RICHARD E. ROGERS, JR., in his official capacity as the Director of the Division of Water Resources of the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Intervenor:
MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC, DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC and DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC
Haw River Assembly v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
as 26-1470
Petitioner:
HAW RIVER ASSEMBLY, 7 DIRECTIONS OF SERVICE, SIERRA CLUB and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, DANIEL P. DRISCOLL, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Army, LIEUTENANT GENERAL WILLIAM H. GRAHAM, JR., in his official capacity as U.S. Army Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC, DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC and DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC
Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, et al v. FERC
as 26-1071
Petitioner:
Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, 7 Directions of Service, Appalachian Voices and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, Duke Energy Progress, LLC, Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
