Cases 41 - 50 of 57
ATALLA et al v. 7-ELEVEN, INC.
as 3:2013cv04578
Plaintiff:
NEIL NAIK , HEMANG PATEL , JAYESH PATEL and others
Defendant:
7-ELEVEN, INC. , SEVEN-ELEVEN JAPAN CO., LTD. and SEVEN AND I HOLDINGS CO., LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
7-ELEVEN, INC. v. SODHI
as 3:2013cv03715
Plaintiff:
7-ELEVEN, INC.
Defendant:
KARAMJEET SODHI , MANJINDER SINGH , KARAMJIT SINGH and others
Counter_claimant:
KARAMJEET SODHI , MANJINDER SINGH and KARAMJIT SINGH
Counter_defendant:
7-ELEVEN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
YOUNES et al v. 7-ELEVEN, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv03500
Petitioner:
Azmi Takiedine
Special Master:
PAUL H. ZOUBEK
Plaintiff:
SAM YOUNES and TAMER G. ATALLA
Defendant:
7-ELEVEN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
7-ELEVEN, INC. v. PATEL
as 2:2013cv02155
Plaintiff:
7-ELEVEN, INC.
Defendant:
PRITI PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
7-ELEVEN, INC. v. HUBBI
as 1:2013cv00870
Plaintiff:
7-ELEVEN, INC.
Defendant:
USAMA M. HUBBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
7-ELEVEN, INC. v. AR RAZZAAQ, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv06093
Plaintiff:
7-ELEVEN, INC.
Defendant:
AR RAZZAAQ, INC. , MOHAMMAD JAMIL , AMAMA JAMIL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
7-ELEVEN, INC. v. PAK et al
as 3:2012cv05583
Plaintiff:
7-ELEVEN, INC.
Defendant:
CHONG PAK and JANICE PAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
7-ELEVEN, INC. v. KEZBARI et al
as 1:2012cv04745
Plaintiff:
7-ELEVEN, INC.
Defendant:
KHALED KEZBARI , CAROLE L. KEZBARI and MOHAMMED IQBAL HOSSAIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROUTE 27, LLC. et al v. 7-ELEVEN, INC.
as 3:2012cv01918
Plaintiff:
ROUTE 27, LLC. and KAMAL PATEL
Defendant:
7-ELEVEN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
7-ELEVEN, INC. v. HUBBI
as 1:2011cv07083
Plaintiff:
7-ELEVEN, INC.
Defendant:
USAMA M. HUBBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
