Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Fridline v. Bottom Line Concepts, LLC
as 4:2023cv01193
Plaintiff:
Zachary Fridline
Defendant:
Bottom Line Concepts, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
WEAVER v. TURK et al
as 5:2023cv00927
Plaintiff:
SHANE WEAVER
Defendant:
MARK TURK, CHRISTOPHER QUADRINI, NICOLE QUADRINI and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
BROKERAGE CONCEPTS LLC et al v. KATZ et al
as 2:2019mc00170
Respondent:
SHARON KATZ, FOLKMAN LAW OFFICES, P.C. and SHARON BUCHHOLZ
Petitioner:
BROKERAGE CONCEPTS LLC and HEALTHNOW NEW YORK INC.
PERRONG v. AMERICAN WATER CONCEPTS, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00931
Plaintiff:
ANDREW R. PERRONG
Defendant:
PATRICK JOSEPH ELLIS, V, DOES 1 THROUGH 100, HOME VALUE PROMOTIONS, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
PERRONG v. ADVANCED BROKERAGE CONCEPTS LLC et al
as 2:2018cv02624
Plaintiff:
ANDREW R. PERRONG
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION, ARX HOLDING CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
SEXY HAIR CONCEPTS, LLC v. CONAIR CORPORATION
as 2:2012mc00250
Plaintiff:
SEXY HAIR CONCEPTS, LLC
Defendant:
CONAIR CORPORATION
Objector:
ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC
Cause Of Action: Objection
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. CREATIVE CAPTIAL CONSORTIUM LLC et al
as 2:2009mc00005
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
CREATIVE CAPTIAL CONSORTIUM LLC, A CREATIVE CAPITAL CONCEPTS, LLC and GEORGE L. THEODULE
Receiver:
JONATHAN E. PERLMAN
Securities and Exchange Commission et al v. A Creative Capital Concepts, LLC et al
as 3:2009mc00019
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission and Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Creative Capital Consortium, LLC, A Creative Capital Concepts, LLC and George L. Theodule
Receiver:
Jonathan E. Perlman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
