Cases 1 - 10 of 125
Martins-Almeida, et al v. Garland
as 24-1393
Petitioner:
NEIMAR MARTINS-ALMEIDA, EVELLYN MARTINS-GONCALVES and A. A. G.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
In Re: Motion to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas
as 23-2085
Other:
DEAN TRAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
ALECON ENTERPRISES, TUTYEN MARTIN and DARREN MARTIN
US v. Perez-Olaverria
as 23-1342
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
GEORGE MARTIN PEREZ-OLAVERRIA
Trivedi v. General Electric Company, et al
as 23-1309
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MADHURI TRIVEDI
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO, H. LAWRENCE CULP, JR., in his individual and official capacity, GE BOARD OF DIRECTORS and others
Trivedi v. General Electric Company, et al
as 23-1310
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MADHURI TRIVEDI
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO, GE HEALTHCARE, H. LAWRENCE CULP, JR., in his individual and official capacity and others
Defendant:
WARD BOWMAN and FOLEY AND MANSFIELD LAW FIRM
US v. Scamaroni-Cintron
as 23-1152
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
MARTIN SCAMARONI-CINTRON
Interested Party:
U.S. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF JOB AND FAMILY SERVICES, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and others
Strahan v. McKiernan, et al
as 22-1813
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN, a/k/a Man Against Xtinction, a/k/a MAX
Defendant / Appellee:
MASSACHUSETTS DIVISION OF MARINE FISHERIES, JANET COIT, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Battista Martins Domingos v. Garland
as 22-1775
Petitioner:
GLECIANA BATISTA MARTINS DOMINGOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND
US v. Martin-Alfaro
as 21-1906
Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellee:
ANA LUISA MARTIN-ALFARO
In Re: Gottesfeld
as 21-1802
Petitioner:
MARTIN GOTTESFELD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON and WAYSIDE YOUTH AND FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
