Cases 1 - 10 of 1,876
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Martin et al v. 49th Street Pizza Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv03450
Plaintiff:
Antonio Flores Martin
Defendant:
49th Street Pizza Corp. d/b/a Famous Original Ray's Pizza, Raymangano 7th Ave. Pizza Corp. d/b/a Famous Original Ray's Pizza, Tony Mangano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Jones v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 7:2024cv03417
Plaintiff:
Janajah Monae Jones
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Chong v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03351
Plaintiff:
Wei Yung Chong
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hall v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv03172
Plaintiff:
Angela Marie Hall
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
IN RE: Rachel Genevieve Powers Trust v. Webb, et al
as 1:2024cv03094
Not Yet Classified:
Rachel Genevieve Powers Trust
Defendant:
Jeremiah Darnell Webb, Noah Sencer Robert Barclay, Malakai Levi Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Does et al v. New York City et al
as 1:2024cv03042
Plaintiff:
John Does and Jane Does
Defendant:
New York City, Mayor Eric Adams, NYPD Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Illery v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03068
Plaintiff:
Lora Elizabeth Illery
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Reyes v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02849
Plaintiff:
Indira Reyes
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Utter v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02805
Plaintiff:
Lisa A Utter
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
