Cases 1 - 10 of 112
Beyer v. Deschutes County et al
as 6:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Bryan Martin Beyer
Defendant:
Deschutes County, Michael Molan, Andrew Farey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Velasco v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01976
Petitioner:
Martin Jesus Velasco
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Martines v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01978
Petitioner:
Jhony Alfredo Martines
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
J.B. v. Gray et al
as 3:2023cv01962
Plaintiff:
J.B.
Defendant:
Levi Gray, Jayson Leak, Paul Kizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tindall-Martin v. Reyes
as 2:2023cv01566
Petitioner:
Jayson Andrew Tindall-Martin
Respondent:
Erin Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hilgardner v. Numerous O.D.O.C. Employees
as 6:2023cv01105
Plaintiff:
Martin Hilgardner
Defendant:
Numerous O.D.O.C. Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jonassen et al v. Jacquez et al
as 3:2023cv01010
Plaintiff:
Martin Jonassen and Elizabeth Mary Jonassen
Defendant:
I. Jacquez, D. Suh, B. Cray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jonassen et al v. Warden of Sheridan FCI
as 3:2023cv00646
Petitioner:
Martin Joseph Jonassen and Elizabeth Mary Jonassen
Respondent:
Warden of Sheridan FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. Fhuere
as 3:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Smith
Defendant:
Corey Fhuere, Katy Coba, A. Kidwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Prins et al
as 6:2022cv01712
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Smith
Defendant:
Craig Prins, C/O Drumonet, C/O K. Engles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
