Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Rihanna Pointer, et al v. Scott Phelps, et al
as 26-12085
Plaintiff:
RIHANNA POINTER, GRANT STURDIVANT, TIMONI TAITE and others
Defendant:
SCOTT PHELPS, MIKE BROCK, KAREN BROOKS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00742
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Satterfield v. Alenda et al
as 1:2026cv02334
Defendant:
Yescare Corp., Bernard Alenda, Michael Agonafir and others
Plaintiff:
John Orlando Satterfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03085
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS
The Water Works Board of the City of Auburn, Alabama v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2026cv01875
Plaintiff:
The Water Works Board of the City of Auburn, Alabama
Defendant:
3M Company, Angus Fire, BASF Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Clements et al v. Shapiro et al
as 5:2026cv00985
Plaintiff:
Mark Clements and Cynthia Clements
Defendant:
Elizabeth Rose Shapiro and Angus Brown Deardoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Gaitan v. Angus Steakhouse, Inc. et al
as 0:2026cv61283
Plaintiff:
Pablo Gaitan
Defendant:
Angus Steakhouse, Inc., Moo! Meat Art Corp. and Osmany Estopinan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
The Water Works Board of the City of Auburn, Alabama v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2026cv00256
Plaintiff:
The Water Works Board of the City of Auburn, Alabama
Defendant:
3M Company, Angus Fire, BASF Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
