Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hadley v. Capone et al
as 1:2023cv00553
Plaintiff:
Laura A. Hadley
Defendant:
Chris Capone, Paul Joncas, Pamela Wilkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. In RE: Order of Return Bobby E. Burton Jr.
as 1:2015mc00074
Defendant:
In RE: Order of Return Bobby E. Burton Jr.
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Morriss et al
as 1:2012mc00013
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Burton Douglas Morriss, Acartha Group, LLC, MIC VII, LLC and others
Burton v. Davol Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03276
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Burton
Defendant:
DAVOL INC. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amalgamated Transit Union, division 618 et al v. Rhode Island Public Transit Authority
as 1:2009cv00399
Plaintiff:
Amalgamated Transit Union, division 618, Amalgamated Transit Union, division 618, Henry B. Sheehan and others
Defendant:
Rhode Island Public Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Burton v. American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) et al
as 1:2009cv00043
Plaintiff:
Arthur E. Burton, Jr.
Defendant:
American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) and Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Environment Rhode Island et al v. Town of Middletown
as 1:2008cv00323
Plaintiff:
Environment Rhode Island, Burton Hoffman, Henry Rosemont, Jr and others
Defendant:
Town of Middletown
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Environment Rhode Island et al v. City of Newport et al
as 1:2008cv00265
Plaintiff:
Environment Rhode Island, Burton Horrman, Henry Rosemont, Jr and others
Defendant:
City of Newport and Earth Tech, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Burton v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2007cv01972
Plaintiff:
Diana M. Burton
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
