Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Escobar v. A. Duie Pyle, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02964
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline C Escobar
Defendant:
A. Duie Pyle, Inc. and David Valencia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
Adames v. Martin et al
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
David Adames
Defendant:
Michael Edward Martin and A. Duie Pyle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 au Diversity-Auto Negligence
Mullings v. A. Duie Pyle, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00987
Plaintiff:
Adam Mullings
Defendant:
A. Duie Pyle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Clarke v. Payano et al
as 1:2023cv06043
Plaintiff:
Jamal A. Clarke
Defendant:
Dariel D. Tiburcio Payano and A. Duie Pyle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Puente v. A. Duie Pyle, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05780
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Puente
Defendant:
A. Duie Pyle, Inc. and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 tm Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Puente v A. Duie Pyle, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04100
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Puente
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Defendant A. Duie Pyle, Inc. and Defendant JOHN DOE
Defendant:
A. Duie Pyle, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 tm Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Latimore v. Roman et al
as 1:2022cv01934
Plaintiff:
Charles L Latimore
Defendant:
Juan Roman and A. Duie Pyle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Barnes v. A. Duie Pyle, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01026
Plaintiff:
Wayne Barnes
Defendant:
A. Duie Pyle, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 tm
Veras v. A. Duie Pyle, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv11186
Plaintiff:
Salvador Veras
Defendant:
A. Duie Pyle, Inc. and Caros Quinones Montanez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 au
Rodriguez v. Rotaru-Barac et al
as 1:2021cv06736
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Rodriguez
Defendant:
Anton Rotaru-Barac and A. Duie Pyle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 au
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
