Cases 1 - 10 of 360
Olga v. Marten Transport LTD
as 1:2024cv02369
Plaintiff:
Romero Flores Olga
Defendant:
Marten Transport LTD and Bradley Sather
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Flores v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
as 1:2024cv02021
Plaintiff:
EUSTOLIO FLORES
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation Amtrak
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Staszczuk v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Agnieszka Ciezkal Staszczuk
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Troy A. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Flores v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2023pq03997
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Humberto Flores
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
