Cases 1 - 10 of 3,244
United States of America v. Rodriguez (Fernandez Colon)
as 24-1157
Defendant:
ERIC MANUEL FERNANDEZ COLON, ABEL MONTILLA, DANIEL RODRIGUEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Castro (USA)
as 24-1160
Defendant:
MELVIN CASTRO, LUIS CASTRO, FRANCISCO SANCHEZ-REYES and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
El v. Chun
as 24-1142
Defendant:
BLAIR, JOSEPH FUCITO, Sergeant PETER LITRA, Shield #1197 and others
Plaintiff:
SAGE EL
Guerrero et al v. Philips Bedding Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03198
Plaintiff:
Bulmaro Guerrero
Defendant:
Philips Bedding Inc., Felipe Carbajal and Hector Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Salis v. New York State Bar Association
as 24-1066
Plaintiff:
OWOLABI SALIS
Defendant:
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, DONALD ZOLIN, KEVIN J. DOYLE and others
Williams v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03031
Plaintiff:
Alexander Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
City of New York, Eric Gonzalez, Ernest Chin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Gonzalez et al v. Chabad of Port Washington, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02922
Plaintiff:
Patty Gonzalez and Jonathan Tinoco
Defendant:
Chabad of Port Washington, Inc and Rabbi Shalom M Paltiel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gonzalez et al v. Chabad of Port Washington, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02922
Plaintiff:
Patty Gonzalez and Jonathan Tinocco
Defendant:
Chabad of Port Washington, Inc. and Rabbi Shalom M. Paltiel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gonzalez-Martinez v. Kirkpatrick
as 24-1022
Petitioner:
JAIRON GONZALEZ-MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MICHAEL KIRKPATRICK, Supt. of Clinton Correctional Facility
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
