Cases 21 - 30 of 312
KLAYMAN v. RAO et al
as 1:2021cv02473
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. KLAYMAN and LARRY ELLIOT KLAYMAN
Defendant:
NEOMI RAO, ROBERT L. WILKINS, LAURENCE H. SILBERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MAHONEY v. UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE BOARD et al
as 1:2021cv02314
Plaintiff:
PATRICK J. MAHONEY
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE BOARD, KAREN H. GIBSON, WILLIAM J. WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
FONTANEZ v. BERBER
as 1:2021cv02073
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO FONTANEZ
Defendant:
DAVID H. BERBER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POWELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv02038
Plaintiff:
SONIA POWELL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STEPHEN S. TROTT, THOMAS O. RICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01831
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
LU v. EID et al
as 1:2021cv01389
Defendant:
CLARK WADDOUPS and ALLISON H. EID
Plaintiff:
YAN-XU LU and YUNG-KAI LU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00997
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
CHEBLI v. KABLE , IV et al
as 1:2021cv00937
Defendant:
DAVID PEKOSKE, CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Plaintiff:
AHMAD CHEBLI
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
MAHONEY v. PELOSI et al
as 1:2021cv00859
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE BOARD, KAREN H GIBSON, SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI and others
Plaintiff:
REV. PATRICK J. MAHONEY and PATRICK J. MAHONEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OKEREKE v. MCMAHON et al
as 1:2021cv00518
Defendant:
DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, MICHAEL H. PARK, RICHARD J. SULLIVAN and others
Plaintiff:
PRECIOUS OKEREKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
