Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Smith v. Akinbayo et al
as 1:2022cv00099
Petitioner:
Micah J. Smith
Respondent:
Kolawole Akinbayo and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flynsmith et al v. Sanofi U.S. Services Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01214
Plaintiff:
Nicolia Flynsmith and Bobby J. Smith
Defendant:
Sanofi U.S. Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC , Hospira Worldwide, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv00376
Plaintiff:
Autumn J. Smith
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Smith v. Thirty-Nine Employees of the James T. Vaughn Correctional Center et al
as 1:2013cv01848
Plaintiff:
Albert J. Smith
Defendant:
Thirty-Nine Employees of the James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, Rispoli, Enders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Respler v. Evans et al
as 1:2013cv01097
Plaintiff:
Mark Respler
Defendant:
J. Raleigh Bailes , Brad Bynum , Victor Carrillo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Resnik v. Woertz et al
as 1:2010cv00527
Plaintiff:
Herbert Resnik
Defendant:
Patricia A. Woertz, Steven R. Mills, David J. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Crochet v. Oyster et al
as 1:2009cv00177
Plaintiff:
Troy D Crochet
Defendant:
Michael Oyster, Billy V Ray, Raymond J Smith and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Smith v. Danberg et al
as 1:2007cv00476
Plaintiff:
Paul J. Smith
Defendant:
Carl C. Danberg, Thomas Carroll and Betty Burris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Reginal Medical First Correctional et al
as 1:2007cv00477
Plaintiff:
Paul J. Smith
Defendant:
Reginal Medical First Correctional, Carl C. Danberg and Thomas Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Carroll et al
as 1:2007cv00408
Petitioner:
Harry J. Smith
Respondent:
Thomas Carroll and Attorney General of State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
