Cases 1 - 10 of 41
PUMBA v. GODFREY et al
as 5:2022cv02952
Plaintiff:
OSVALDO MACOSSO FIGUEIREDO PUMBA
Defendant:
MICHAEL GODFREY, JEFFREY COLEMAN, KEVIN QUERIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv04611
Plaintiff:
PAUL D. MANN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MANN v. GARMAN et al
as 2:2021cv01070
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF: PHILADELPHIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF: PENNSYLVANIA and MARK GARMAN
Petitioner:
KEVIN A. MANN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vasquez v. Haste et al
as 1:2021cv00019
Defendant:
Brian S. Clark, Lt. Tim Manwiller, Mike Pries and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv01477
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
PAUL D. MANN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MANN v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2018cv00380
Petitioner:
JOSEPH ROBERT MANN
Respondent:
TAMMY FERGUSON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mann v. Lycoming County Prison et al
as 4:2017cv02240
Plaintiff:
James M. Mann
Defendant:
Lycoming County Prison, Clinton County Correctional Facility and Corrent Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv05149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANN v. KAUFFMAN et al
as 2:2017cv03990
Petitioner:
SYHEAM MANN
Respondent:
KAUFFMAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DEBERRY et al v. EASTON HOSPITAL et al
as 5:2017cv01929
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL DEBERRY
Defendant:
EASTON HOSPITAL, CHRISTOPHER MANN, EASTON HOSPITAL NURSE STAFF LIST OF DELIVER FLOOR AND NIGHT SHIFT ALSO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
