Cases 1 - 10 of 11
WEINSCHENK v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2022cv01150
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WEINSCHENK
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, ERIC HOLCOMB, SUZANNE CROUCH and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2009mc00077
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
DAWN DESIREE CUMMINGS, FAZIA DEEN-BACCHUS, LISA MARIE DIRIG and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02052
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01971
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01755
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
SHORTT v. MANN et al
as 1:2010cv01325
Defendant:
RICHARD A. MANN, RICHARD A. MANN, P.C. and SOUTH CENTRAL SURGERY CENTER, LLC
Plaintiff:
SHANNEN SHORTT
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MANN et al v. SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2010cv00252
Plaintiff:
SHERRI MANN and THAD MANN
Defendant:
SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
MANN v. FIFTH THIRD BANK et al
as 1:2010cv00270
Defendant:
CSC CREDIT SERVICES, INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
AMBER L. MANN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
PALAZZOLO v. MANN et al
as 1:2009mc00113
Plaintiff:
JULIE PALAZZOLO
Defendant:
KULWINDER SINGH MANN and THE BUFFALO GROUP OF COMPANIES, INC.
IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CLE REQUIREMENTS
as 1:2007mc00081
Respondent:
DOUGLAS CHARLES AMBERGER, JENNIFER JONES AUGER, DAVID JOHN BACHMAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
