Cases 1 - 10 of 81
HARRIS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
MORRIS HARRIS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Rhodes v. McDonough
as 24-1101
Claimant:
MORRIS LIONEL RHODES
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
TRUST v. USA
as 1:2023cv01640
Plaintiff:
MODUPE TRUST and PATRICIA JEAN MORRIS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
MORRIS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00760
Petitioner:
GORDON MORRIS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc. v. Altria Client Services LLC
as 23-1942
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RAI STRATEGIC HOLDINGS, INC. and R.J. REYNOLDS VAPOR COMPANY
Defendant:
ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC and PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
PHILIP MORRIS PRODUCTS S.A.
RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc. v. Altria Client Services LLC
as 23-1892
Plaintiff:
RAI STRATEGIC HOLDINGS, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R.J. REYNOLDS VAPOR COMPANY
Defendant / Appellee:
ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC, PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC. and PHILIP MORRIS PRODUCTS S.A.
ATS Ford Drive Investment, LLC v. US
as 23-1760
Plaintiff:
ATS FORD DRIVE INVESTMENT, LLC, ALEXANDER AUTO AND RADIATOR REPAIR, RONALD MORRIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GODBY PROPERTIES, LP, REZIN FAMILY INVESTMENTS LLS, Greenstone Asset Management, c/o, BRIAN L. SCHOONVELD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Healthier Choices Management Corp. v. Philip Morris Products S.A.
as 23-1529
Appellant:
HEALTHIER CHOICES MANAGEMENT CORP.
Appellee:
PHILIP MORRIS PRODUCTS S.A. and PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC.
MorrisIn re: Morris
as 23-1015
Appellant:
In re: JESSICA MORRIS, GLENN RIGGS, AMY DALEY and others
Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
