Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Francielica Da Silva, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1893
Petitioner:
FRANCIELICA GESSICA DA SILVA, JOAO ROSA PEREIRA-DA SILVA, A. P.-D. S. and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ricardo Fernandes-Gomes, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1392
Petitioner:
RICARDO FERNANDES-GOMES, JESSICA CARDOSO PEREIRA-FERNANDES and H. A. C-F.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Genivaldo Pimenta, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1354
Petitioner:
GENIVALDO PEREIRA PIMENTA, QUEITANI DE SOUZA ALVES and CARLOS EDUARDO SOUZA PEREIRA ALVES
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
David Jaroslawicz, et al v. M&T Bank Corp, et al
as 23-8038
Respondent:
BELINA FAMILY and JEFF KRUBLIT
Petitioner:
M&T BANK CORP, HUDSON CITY BANCORP INC, ROBERT G. WILMERS and others
Constellation Services International, Inc. v. Anderson et al
as 1:2023cv00762
Plaintiff:
Constellation Services International, Inc.
Defendant:
Walter Anderson, Space Incorporated S.A., Gold & Appel Transfer S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Marcio Pereira Maia v. Attorney General United States
as 20-2863
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
MARCIO PEREIRA MAIA
Robson Pereira v. Attorney General United States
as 20-2452
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
ROBSON PEREIRA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01404
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00816
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
George Pereira v. Attorney General United State
as 17-3704
Petitioner:
GEORGE PEREIRA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
