Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Gooch v. Correction Corporation of America et al
as 2:2015cv02744
Plaintiff:
James Gooch
Defendant:
Correction Corporation of America, Michael Donahue, Robert Shouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gooch v. Correction Corporation of America et al
as 1:2015cv02744
Plaintiff:
James Gooch
Defendant:
Correction Corporation of America, Michael Donahue, Robert Shouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neidhardt v. Shouse et al
as 1:2015cv00088
Plaintiff:
Frances E. Neidhardt
Defendant:
Billy Wayne Shouse, Sharon Kay Thomas and Jack Knowles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bennett v. TN Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv01001
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
TN Department of Corrections, Law Enforcement Unit, Scott Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Davis et al
as 1:2014cv01116
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Davis, Crowder, James Wilkes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Roberts et al
as 1:2014cv01113
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Geneva Roberts, Michael Donahue, Mitchell Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. TN Dept of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv01097
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
TN Dept of Corrections, Investigations and Compliance et al Unit, Jonathon Flake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Cox et al
as 1:2014cv01091
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Cox, Cleek, Daniel Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Donahue et al
as 1:2014cv01120
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Michael Donahue, Corrections Corporation of America, Mitchell Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Goowin et al
as 1:2014cv01057
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Goowin, Cassaday, Shouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
