Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Wilson v. Jackson et al
as 4:2018cv01450
Plaintiff:
Lajohn Fitzgerald Wilson
Defendant:
John W. Jackson, Neal G. Naccarato and Robert Mohammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Enriquez v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2015cv03072
Plaintiff:
Davey Enriquez
Defendant:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, Christopher S. Lacox, E. Oaks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates et al v. Laminack et al
as 2:2012cv00387
Plaintiff:
Frank Bates , Richard Brown , Bruce D Cochran and others
Defendant:
Richard N Laminack, John M. O'Quinn & Associates, PLLC d/b/a The O'Quinn Law Firm, John M. O'Quinn & Associates, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv03169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
SL FUS of Houston, L.L.C., a/k/a Sightline of Houston, L.L.C., a/k/a Sightline of Houston, L.P. et al v. Insightec-TxSonics, Inc., a/k/a Insightec - Image GuidedTreatment, L.T.D., a/k/a Insightec, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv01379
Plaintiff:
SL FUS of Houston, L.L.C., a/k/a Sightline of Houston, L.L.C., a/k/a Sightline of Houston, L.P. , EHP, L.L.C. , Houston ExAblate Physician Partners, L.L.C. and others
Defendant:
Insightec-TxSonics, Inc., a/k/a Insightec - Image GuidedTreatment, L.T.D., a/k/a Insightec, Inc. , Arthur Chan , Alikacem Nadir and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SL FUS of Houston, L.L.C. et al v. Chan et al
as 4:2010cv02066
Plaintiff:
SL FUS of Houston, L.L.C , EHP, L.L.C. , Houston Exablate Physician Partners, L.L.C. and others
Defendant:
Arthur Chan , Nadir Alikacem , Elbit Systems U.S. Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jackson v. Hoffmann
as 4:2008cv03106
Plaintiff:
Robert W Jackson
Defendant:
H Chris Hoffmann
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
