Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,768
Thomas Baltrusaitis, et al v. UAW, et al
as 24-1356
Plaintiff: THOMAS BALTRUSAITIS, GUILLERMO ANTUNEZ, PATRICK BARTH and others
Defendant: JEROME DURDEN, MICHAEL BROWN, GARY JONES and others
South Elkhorn Village, LLC v. City of Georgetown, KY, et al
as 24-5401
Plaintiff: SOUTH ELKHORN VILLAGE, LLC
Defendant: CITY OF GEORGETOWN, KY, GEORGETOWN MUNICIPAL WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM, CHASE AZEVEDO, in his official capacity as Manager of the Georgetown Municipal Water and Sewer System and in his individual capacity and others
USA v. William Siefert
as 24-5384
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: WILLIAM LAWRENCE SIEFERT, MD
David Little v. City of Saginaw, MI, et al
as 24-1335
Plaintiff: DAVID WILLIAM LITTLE
Defendant: CITY OF SAGINAW, MI, JORDAN LADOUCE, Police Officer and STEVEN LAUTNER, Police Officer
In re: William Petrey
as 24-5370
Petitioner: In re: WILLIAM ROYAL PETREY
Respondent: KEVIN MAZZA, Warden
USA v. Thomas Weir, et al
as 24-5335
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: THOMAS K. WEIR, WILLIAM L. DONALDSON and PAMELA SPIVEY
Tommy WilliamsIn re: Tommy Williams
as 24-1296
Petitioner: In re: TOMMY LOUIS WILLIAMS
Respondent: JAMES R. SCHIEBNER, Warden
Chelesy Eastep v. City of Nashville, TN, et al
as 24-5319
Plaintiff: CHELESY EASTEP, as surviving spouse and next of kin of Landon Dwayne Eastep
Defendant: CITY OF NASHVILLE, TN, BRIAN MURPHY, in his individual and official capacity as an officer of the Metropolitan Nashville Police Department, STEVEN CARRICK, in their individual and official capacity as an officer of the Metropolitan Nashville Police Department and others
USA v. Samuel Nelson
as 24-1290
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: SAMUEL WILLIAMS NELSON
USA v. Cortez Williams
as 24-3288
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: CORTEZ K.D. WILLIAMS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?