Cases 1 - 10 of 174
Davison v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Gabriel Davison
Defendant:
Clifford J Smith, Scott Rowland, Robert L Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loggins v. Huffman et al
as 6:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Lee Anthony Loggins
Defendant:
J. Huffman, C. Kirkland, Unknown Agent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Andrew Fields, III
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, John Doe, D Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Sipes et al
as 6:2024cv00018
Respondent:
B Sipes, Braniy, Ms Lt. Earnest and others
Petitioner:
Jimmie McCay, III
Plaintiff:
Jimmie McCoy, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCay v. Sipes et al
as 5:2023cv01102
Defendant:
B Sipes, Braniy, Ms Lt. Earnest and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmie McCay, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David v. Hodges et al
as 6:2023cv00405
Defendant:
Angela Cacey, FNU Fisk, Dustin Hodges and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Adrian David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Sipes et al
as 6:2023cv00404
Plaintiff:
Jimmie McCoy, III
Defendant:
B Sipes, Lt. Lysinger, C.O. Musile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00912
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lee Martin
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Steven Harpe, Mark Knutson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawton v. Bridges
as 6:2023cv00272
Petitioner:
Theodoric B. Lawton
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. Tulsa Police Department et al
as 4:2023cv00288
Defendant:
B Keener, J Faircloth, Tulsa Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Dario Perez Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
