Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bolton v. Ramos
as 1:2023cv09539
Petitioner:
Eric T. Bolton
Respondent:
Acting Warden Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bolton v. Ramos
as 1:2023cv10657
Petitioner:
Eric T. Bolton
Respondent:
Acting Warden Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bolton v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv10577
Plaintiff:
Eric Bolton
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bolton v. USA
as 1:2023cv00872
Petitioner:
Benjamin Bolton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Todie v. NYS DOCCs Parole Div. QNS Ballroop et al
as 1:2022cv07960
Plaintiff:
Eugene A. Todie
Defendant:
NYS DOCCs Parole Div. QNS Ballroop, Ballroops Assistant Diaz, Supervisor Gonzazes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Passarella v. New York City Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv07265
Defendant:
C.O. Bolton, C.O. Charles, New York City Department of Corrections and others
Female:
C.O. Martin
Plaintiff:
John Passarella
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bolton v. USA
as 1:2017cv01095
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Benjamin Bolton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bolton v. Cox et al
as 1:2015cv01039
Plaintiff:
Benjamin J. Bolton
Defendant:
Wayne Cox and Xulon Press, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bolton et al v. Department of Corrections
as 1:2013cv05749
Plaintiff:
Shady Bolton, Derrick Francis and Jonathan Groenow
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Concepcion et al
as 1:2010cv09095
Plaintiff:
Donald Mack Bennett
Defendant:
Eddie Concepcion, Darryl Bolton, Issac Munden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
