Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Conner v. Paxton et al
as 1:2023cv01058
Plaintiff:
Stacy L Conner
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Governor Greg Abbott and Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conner v. Paxton Case transferred to Western District of Texas, Austin Division.
as 2:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Stacy L Conner
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Greg Abbott and Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles v. Tichota Conner et al
as 4:2023cv03106
Plaintiff:
Ian Sylvester Chales and Ian Sylvester Charles
Defendant:
Tichota Conner, Judge Christopher Dean Morton and Judge Denise Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conner v. United States Treasury
as 6:2023cv00408
Plaintiff:
James E. Conner
Defendant:
United States Treasury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Troutt v. Collier et al
as 3:2021cv00146
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Warden Bruce Armstrong, Bright Oslgwe and others
Plaintiff:
Conner Troutt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conner v. U.S.A.
as 6:2020cv00990
Plaintiff:
Catrina Conner
Defendant:
U.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Conner v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2020cv03174
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Christian Dior Conner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01766
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Andrade v. Amarillo Police Department and Police Officers et al
as 2:2019cv00152
Defendant:
Potter County Sheriff Department an Staff, Nancy Esparza, Chief of Police and others
Plaintiff:
Noel Valdez Andrade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Abbott et al
as 1:2018cv00667
Defendant:
Abel Acosta, Gang Unit Officer FNU Salazar, Terry R. Means and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Joe Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
