Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cater v King County et al
as 2:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
Halfred Cater
Defendant:
King County, King County Adult Corrections Department, Faauma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Incident Catering Services LLC v. Nance
as 2:2022cv00591
Plaintiff:
Incident Catering Services, LLC doing business as Ellipse Global a Limited Liability Company
Defendant:
Kenneth Errol Nance
United States of America v. Landrum et al
as 2:2016mc00097
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Paul Benedict Landrum
Garnishee:
Gourmet Caterers Inc
Cater v. Superior Court of Washington
as 2:2015cv01634
Petitioner:
Halfred Cater
Respondent:
Superior Court of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cater v. Superior Court of Washington
as 2:2015cv01621
Petitioner:
Halfred Cater
Respondent:
Superior Court of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cater v. King County Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv01219
Plaintiff:
Halfred Cater
Defendant:
King County Corrections, Elaine, Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cater v. Federal Way Police Department et al
as 2:2015cv01220
Plaintiff:
Halfred Cater
Defendant:
Federal Way Police Department, Kim Richard, Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayo et al v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 2:2011cv01115
Plaintiff:
Eleonor A Mayo
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs, Grace Rhem, Sara Cater and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Cater v. King County et al
as 2:2010cv01259
Plaintiff:
Sir Jonz Cater
Defendant:
King County, Hikari Tamuroy, David Fleming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keiser et al v. Terri D's Catering Inc et al
as 2:2009cv01513
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Keiser, Rodney Mehl, Evelyn Nyseth and others
Defendant:
Terri D's Catering Inc, Terri D's Catering Inc, Charles Doremus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
