Cases 1 - 10 of 220
Daniel Harper v. C. Chatman
as 2:2024cv03902
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Harper
Defendant:
C Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00561
Plaintiff:
Michele Chatman Jackson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Brandy Meon Chatman v. Sprouts Farmers Market, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Brandy Meon Chatman
Petitioner:
Sprouts Farmers Market, LLC
Defendant:
DOES 1 to 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Philip R. Chatman v. John Roberts et al
as 2:2023cv04503
Plaintiff:
Philip R. Chatman, Jr.
Defendant:
John Roberts, Clarence Thomas, Samuel A. Alito and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Chatman v. Wedriveu, Inc.
as 3:2022cv04848
Plaintiff:
Precious Chatman
Defendant:
Circle K Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Chatman v. WeDriveU, Inc
as 3:2022cv04849
Plaintiff:
Precious Chatman
Defendant:
WEDRIVEU, INC. and WeDriveU, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Chatman v. WeDriveU, Inc
as 3:2022cv04850
Plaintiff:
Precious Chatman
Defendant:
WEDRIVEU, INC. and WeDriveU, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
2019-4 IH Borrower, LP v. Daryl Jones et al
as 5:2022cv01432
Plaintiff:
2019-4 IH Borrower, LP
Defendant:
Daryl Jones, Alicia Chatman and Does 1 to 10 inclusive
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
