Cases 1 - 10 of 545
United States of America v. Peeler (Adrian Peeler)
as 24-1240
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ADRIAN PEELER, RUSSELL PEELER, JR., SHAWN KENNEDY and others
Pearson v. City of New York
as 24-1167
Plaintiff:
LESTER PEARSON
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, DARCEL CLARK, Bronx County District Attorney; In His Personal Capacity and others
Harris v. The City of New York
as 24-1004
Plaintiff:
ISHMAEL C. HARRIS, YUSUF A. HARRIS, GREGORY S. HARRIS and others
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANDREW DIETZ, New York City Police Department Detective and others
Bradshaw v. Annucci
as 24-819
Defendant:
GRAVELL, Mental Health Therapist, Upstate Correctional Facility, UHLER, Superintendent, Upstate Correctional Facility, R. CANTWELL, Commissioner Hearing Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
JAY BRADSHAW
Clark v. State of New York
as 24-829
Petitioner:
ERIC WADE CLARK
Respondent:
NYS OFFICE OF MENTAL HEALTH, STATE OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION and others
Andrews v. United States of America
as 24-794
Petitioner:
LEMREY ANDREWS, Pimp Blood Red, Pimp Bloody and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Maisonet (Negron Sr.)
as 24-572
Defendant:
GUILLERMO NEGRON, SR., FRANCISCO MAISONET, JOSE MAISONET and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01973
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Garofalo v. AVROBIO, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01493
Plaintiff:
Michael Garofalo
Defendant:
AVROBIO, Inc., Bruce Booth, Ian Clark and others
Honigman v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation
as 24-454
Plaintiff:
GLADYS HONIGMAN, Individually and on behalf of all others Similarly situated and D. JOSEPH KURTZ
Appellant:
THEODORE H. FRANK
Defendant:
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
