Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Pace Industry Union-Management Pension Fund and its Trustees et al v. Clarke Manufacturing, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00290
Plaintiff:
Pace Industry Union-Management Pension Fund and its Trustees , Stan Johnson , Dale Olson and others
Defendant:
Clarke Manufacturing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Clark v. Sunrise Dental Services, Inc.
as 3:2010cv01206
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Clark
Defendant:
Sunrise Dental Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wims et al v. Olympus America, Inc.
as 3:2008cv01023
Plaintiff:
Donald Wims, Donald Wims, David Cole and others
Defendant:
Olympus America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pace Industry Union-Management Pension Fund et al v. Clarke Manufacturing, Inc.
as 3:2008cv00826
Plaintiff:
Pace Industry Union-Management Pension Fund, Pace Industry Union-Management Pension Fund, Boyd Young and others
Defendant:
Clarke Manufacturing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Coffman et al v. AMS Utiliserv, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00112
Plaintiff:
Dustin Coffman, Dustin Coffman, Dustin Coffman and others
Defendant:
AMS Utiliserv, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Clark v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 2:2008cv02088
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Clark and Michael R. Clark
Defendant:
Walgreen Co. and Walgreen, Dyersburg, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Southern Electrical Retirement Fund v. Kevin Clark Electrical Services LLC
as 3:2008cv00037
Plaintiff:
Southern Electrical Retirement Fund
Defendant:
Kevin Clark Electrical Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Pace Industry Union-Management Pension Fund et al v. O.E. Clark Paper Box Company
as 3:2007cv00850
Plaintiff:
Pace Industry Union-Management Pension Fund, Pace Industry Union-Management Pension Fund, Boyd Young and others
Defendant:
O.E. Clark Paper Box Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
