Cases 1 - 10 of 214
PARHAM v. COLEMAN et al
as 5:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
MANDRELL PARHAM
Defendant:
CHARLES COLEMAN and CESAR SISKA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00007
Petitioner:
Ra'Ann Michelle Coleman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Coleman v. McGhee
as 4:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Joshua Coleman
Defendant:
Officer McGhee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paschal v. Coleman
as 3:2023cv00227
Petitioner:
Edward Paschal
Respondent:
Jeff Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCGILL v. COLEMAN et al
as 5:2023cv00329
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY ANDREW MCGILL
Defendant:
CHARLES COLEMAN, CESAR SISKA and DOCTOR CESAR SISKA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greene v. Sheriff, Richmond County Jail
as 1:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Brandon Greene
Defendant:
Sheriff, Richmond County Jail, Lt. M. Cheatam, SGT. N. Cowart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIBSON v. CORRECT CARE INTEGRATED HEALTH et al
as 5:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
BARRY LYNN GIBSON
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE INTEGRATED HEALTH, CHARLES COLEMAN and DR SISKA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kilpatrick v. Coleman et al
as 1:2023cv02614
Petitioner:
Adrian Kilpatrick
Respondent:
Warden Coleman and Ware State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valentinis-Dee v. Federal Correctional Complex Coleman
as 1:2023cv02202
Plaintiff:
James Valentinis-Dee
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Complex Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arrechavaleta v. Salem et al
as 1:2023cv02080
Petitioner:
Pablo Arrechavaleta
Respondent:
Warden S. Salem, Warden S. Jenkins, USP Atlanta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
