Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dicks v. Schatz et al
as 1:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Karl Orlando Dicks
Defendant:
Brian Schatz, Calvin Say, Choon James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. County of Hawaii
as 1:2021cv00264
Defendant:
County of Hawaii, Kuilee Dela Cruz, Levon Stevens and others
Plaintiff:
Joel H. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomes et al v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2020cv00494
Defendant:
Bruce Robinson, Lance K. Parker, McBryde Sugar Company, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Hilton Kalanipio Niau, Punohu Nalimu Kekaualua, III, Timothy Oga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vera Cruz v. Aki et al
as 1:2020cv00038
Defendant:
Andrea A'ana, BMBN Hawaii L.P., Pomaikai Holdings Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kristin Vera Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00332
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
3Rd Party Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00190
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dela Cruz v. Todd
as 1:2016cv00668
Plaintiff:
Gina Diane Inda Dela Cruz
Defendant:
Tamara Todd
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Dela Cruz v. Child Welfare Services et al
as 1:2016cv00669
Plaintiff:
Gina Diane Inda Dela Cruz
Defendant:
Child Welfare Services and Patrice Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
