Cases 1 - 10 of 69
VALADEZ DE LA CRUZ v. RACHEL THOMPSON, WARDEN
as 1:2024cv05635
Petitioner:
EFRAIN VALADEZ DE LA CRUZ
Respondent:
RACHEL THOMPSON, WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RECANATI v. BERGEN COUNTY SHERIFFS et al
as 2:2024cv05131
Plaintiff:
SCOTT ANTHONY RECANATI
Defendant:
BERGEN COUNTY SHERIFFS, COUNTY OF BERGEN, MICHAEL ALBANESE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PINEDA v. CRUZ
as 1:2024cv00422
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL ALVAREZ PINEDA
Defendant:
ANDY CRUZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHUMAKER v. FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION FORT DIX et al
as 1:2023cv20834
Petitioner:
BRIAN SCHUMAKER
Respondent:
FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION FORT DIX, WARDEN STEVIE KNIGHT and ACTING WARDEN ANDY CRUZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GOMEZ-ENAMORADO v. CRUZ
as 1:2023cv20648
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER GOMEZ-ENAMORADO
Respondent:
ANDY CRUZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MALDONADO v. CRUZ
as 1:2023cv20546
Petitioner:
AMADO MALDONADO
Respondent:
ACTING WARDEN CRUZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CANCHINGRE v. CRUZ
as 1:2023cv20486
Petitioner:
JIMMI MARZANA CANCHINGRE
Respondent:
ANDY CRUZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MENDEZ v. ACTING WARDEN CRUZ
as 1:2023cv16612
Petitioner:
RUDI MENDEZ
Respondent:
ACTING WARDEN CRUZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CRUZ v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2023cv16879
Plaintiff:
RAMOS M. CRUZ
Defendant:
WARDEN, OFFICER PETTY, OFFICER J.C. DARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHERE v. CRUZ
as 1:2023cv04723
Petitioner:
JAIME FERNANDO GRACIA CHERE
Respondent:
WARDEN CRUZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
