Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00036
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Doe et al v. Lamoille South Supervisory Union School District
as 5:2011cv00225
Plaintiff:
Joe E. Doe , Jack L. Doe and Mary Doe
Defendant:
Lamoille South Supervisory Union School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Zorn v. The State of Vermont et al
as 1:2011cv00221
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Zorn
Defendant:
The State of Vermont, The United States of America, Vermont State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roy v. USA Govt. et al
as 5:2011cv00213
Plaintiff:
Kamal Karna Roy
Defendant:
USA Govt., All States of USA, Associated Press Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Gilman et al v. Town of Hardwick et al
as 5:2010cv00163
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Gilman , R. B. , A. T. and others
Defendant:
Town of Hardwick, Unknown Police Officers 1-5, Laurent G. Bellavance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Scott v. Palos et al
as 2:2009cv00281
Plaintiff:
Christina Scott
Defendant:
Leslie Palos, Sandra Curtis, Board of Directors, Woodhaven Manor Condominium Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Avila v. Gamache et al
as 1:2009cv00225
Plaintiff:
Ester E. Avila
Defendant:
Michael Gamache and Mary Liberty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
