Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in New York
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,503
Calderon v. Patti et al
as 6:2024cv06117
Plaintiff: Duntrell Calderon
Defendant: Frank Patti, Fox, E. Cosgrove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Torres et al
as 9:2024cv00249
Plaintiff: Alexander Holmes
Defendant: Ms. Torres, Z. Jordan, D. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sloane v. Rowland et al
as 6:2024cv06103
Plaintiff: Derek Sloane
Defendant: C.O. W. M. Rowland, E. Mathews, C.O. A. Altta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Labarge et al
as 9:2024cv00139
Plaintiff: Sincere Smith
Defendant: Labarge, C.O. A.N. Martin, C.O. A.U. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Lowerre We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2024cv00123
Petitioner: Wardell Watson
Respondent: E. Lowerre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Piper et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2024cv00561
Plaintiff: Adam E. Murphy
Defendant: Correctin Officer Piper, Orange County Sheriffs Office and Orange County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sierra v. Covello et al
as 9:2024cv00108
Plaintiff: Francisco Sierra
Defendant: Patrick Covello, E. Baskerville, M. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Struble v. Tope
as 6:2024cv06036
Petitioner: David E. Struble
Respondent: Danielle Tope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Struble v. Tope
as 9:2024cv00042
Petitioner: David E. Struble
Respondent: Danielle Tope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jallow v. Geffner et al
as 1:2024cv00233
Plaintiff: Yaya Jallow
Defendant: Edward I. Geffner, Leticia Randle, Robert Lashley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?