Cases 51 - 60 of 4,006
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00684
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
BURMIN et al v. E*TRADE SECURITIES LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00603
Plaintiff:
SERGEY BURMIN and KENNETH W. LUKE
Defendant:
E*TRADE SECURITIES LLC and MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
RODRIGUEZ v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 1:2024cv00621
Petitioner:
JEAN E. RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CHAN v. RENE et al
as 2:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
YUNG F CHAN
Defendant:
GUERRA-BARRCRA E RENE, ITJ TRUCKING, LLC, JOHN DOE 1-10 (FICTICIOUS DEFENDANTS) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
KAO et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
JOHN KAO and ANDREY GYUROV
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, THIBAUT MONGON, PAUL RUH and others
KAO et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
JOHN KAO and ANDREY GYUROV
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, THIBAUT MONGON, PAUL RUH and others
WILSON et al v. MONGON et al
as 3:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Susan K. Wilson and Jessica Bruckner
Defendant:
THIBAUT MONGON, PAUL RUH, HEATHER HOWLETT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
