Cases 51 - 60 of 184
Sowers et al v. Banning
as 2:2017cv00090
Plaintiff:
David Sowers and Laura Gillice
Defendant:
Tyler E Banning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carvill v. Roger Henson Trucking LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00037
Plaintiff:
Richard W Carvill
Defendant:
Roger Henson Trucking LLC and Samuel E Dedmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bury v. StanCorp Financial Group Inc
as 2:2017cv00011
Plaintiff:
Susan E Bury
Defendant:
StanCorp Financial Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. 2314 E Primavera Loop, Mohave County, Fort Mohave, Arizona
as 2:2016cv00297
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
2314 E Primavera Loop, Mohave County, Fort Mohave, Arizona
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Beliveau v. Beliveau et al
as 2:2016cv00281
Plaintiff:
Richard Beliveau
Defendant:
Joseph V Beliveau , Christopher E Beliveau and Jeanne Hirsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lundahl et al v. Global E LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00142
Plaintiff:
Marti Lundahl and Hollie Telford
Defendant:
Global E LLC, Thomas Deering, Nena James and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Raymond v. Edward D Jones & Company LP
as 2:2016cv00123
Plaintiff:
Mark E Raymond
Defendant:
Edward D Jones & Company LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cupps et al v. Pioneer Canal-Lake Hattie Irrigation District
as 2:2016cv00086
Plaintiff:
C Mark Cupps , Mark B Koenig , Cheryl L Koenig and others
Defendant:
Pioneer Canal-Lake Hattie Irrigation District
Counter_claimant:
Pioneer Canal-Lake Hattie Irrigation District
Counter_defendant:
Cheryl L Koenig , Phillip Koski , C Mark Cupps and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 946
Gonzales v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv00088
Petitioner:
Mark E Gonzales
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BMO Harris Bank NA v. Surber
as 1:2016cv00052
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank NA
Defendant:
John E Surber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
