Cases 61 - 70 of 1,224
LESTER E. COX MEDICAL CENTER WELFARE BENEFIT GROUP INSURANCE PLAN v. USA
as 1:2023cv00647
Plaintiff:
LESTER E. COX MEDICAL CENTER WELFARE BENEFIT GROUP INSURANCE PLAN
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF KANSAS CITY WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN v. USA
as 1:2023cv00641
Plaintiff:
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF KANSAS CITY WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN
Defendant:
USA
Consolidated Plaintiff:
LOUISIANA HEALTH SERVICE & INDEMNITY COMPANY WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN, HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL PLAN FOR BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD OF SC, THE CAREFIRST FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Lawrence v. McDonough
as 23-1829
Claimant:
JAMES E. LAWRENCE
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Rainey v. US
as 23-1793
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONNIE E. RAINEY, II and DONNIE EUGENE RAINEY, II
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
BENBOW et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv00490
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BENBOW, JOSEPH BILANDZIJA, GENE E. BILDERBACK and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Asociacion de Exportadores e Industriales de Aceitunas de Mesa et al v. United States
as 1:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Asociacion de Exportadores e Industriales de Aceitunas de Mesa, Agro Sevilla Aceitunas S. Coop. And. and Angel Camacho Alimentacion, S.L.
Defendant:
United States
Not Yet Classified:
Musco Family Olive Company
CUMMINS et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY Y. M. CUMMINS, DAVID P. GIAMELLARO, CAROLYN A. GONZALEZ and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
ARTER v. USA
as 1:2023cv00282
Plaintiff:
HARRY E. ARTER
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
MANDRY v. USA
as 1:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
JAVIER MANDRY and JAVIER E. MANDRY-MERCADO
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
