Patent Cases filed in Oregon
Seiko Epson Corporation et al v. E TOP, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00484
Defendant: Shuping Hong Hurley, E TOP, LLC and Xuming Hong
Plaintiff: Epson Portland Inc., Seiko Epson Corporation and Epson America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Schrock et al v. State of Oregon et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01264
Plaintiff: Duane Michael Schrock and Julie Kaye Embry
Defendant: JR Johnson, Douglas E. Woodcock, State of Oregon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
e-Tool Development, Inc. et al v Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00720
Defendant: Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.
Plaintiff: e-Tool Development, Inc. and e-Tool Patent Holdings, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Caldwell v. Haney Enterprises, LLC
as 3:2015cv01494
Plaintiff: Paul E. Caldwell
Defendant: Haney Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Berkeley Law And Technology Group v. Jacobson et al
as 3:2010cv00437
Plaintiff: Berkeley Law And Technology Group
Defendant: James E. Jacobson, Jr. and P.C. James E. Jacobson
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Seiko Epson Corporation et al v. E-Babylon, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv00896
Plaintiff: Seiko Epson Corporation, Epson America, Inc. and Epson Portland, Inc.
Defendant: E-Babylon, Inc., Linkyo Corp., Cartridges Are Us, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?