Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Enciso v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01965
Petitioner:
Guillermo Galindo Enciso
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Morgan v. Galindo et al
as 3:2023cv01541
Plaintiff:
Justin E Morgan
Defendant:
Juan Leal Galindo and Leal Transport, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01355
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Galindo v. Cain
as 2:2017cv00105
Respondent:
Brad Cain
Petitioner:
Alfredo P. Galindo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Walcutts et al
as 6:2015cv00576
Defendant:
Ms. Michell Baglioni, Mr. Ian Clanton, Mr. Richard Galindo and others
Plaintiff:
Clint Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Galindo v. Nooth
as 2:2015cv00199
Petitioner:
Alfredo P. Galindo
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
503) 947-4794 (fax:
Lynn David Larsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Clanton et al
as 3:2014cv01290
Defendant:
Ms. Michell Baglioni, Mr. Barnes, Mr. Ian Clanton and others
Plaintiff:
Clint Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Galindo v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2014cv01221
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Alfredo P. Galindo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv00887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Acosta-Rivas et al. v Hines Growers, LLC
as 3:2011cv01248
Plaintiff:
Avelino Acosta-Rivas, Jose L. Acosta-Rivas, Ponciano Andrade-Arroyo and others
Defendant:
Hines Growers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101 -2104 (WARN) Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
