Cases filed in Puerto Rico
Cases 11 - 20 of 212
Caratini-Soto v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico by Authority Hon. Pedro Pierluisi et al
as 3:2023cv01111
Plaintiff: Magdalena Caratini-Soto
Defendant: Commonwealth of Puerto Rico by Authority Hon. Pedro Pierluisi, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico-Dept of Justice, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico by authority Hon. Secretary of Justice Mr.. Domingo Emmanuelli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Feliciano-Mendez et al v. Hospital Comunitario Buen Samaritano, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01638
Plaintiff: Damaris Feliciano Mendez, Efrain Perez and Damaris Feliciano-Mendez
Defendant: Hospital Comunitario Buen Samaritano, Inc., Dr. Edgar A. Pou, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Gomez-Morales et al v. Hospital Espanol Auxilio Mutuo, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01632
Plaintiff: Yashira Gmez-Morales, Luis Antonio Gmez-Morales, Yashira Gomez-Morales and others
Defendant: Hospital Espanol Auxilio Mutuo, Inc., Dr. David H. Solis-Lopez, The Medical Protective Company(MedPro Group) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Saunders et al v. International Hospitality Management, Inc et al
as 3:2022cv01626
Plaintiff: Ryan K Saunders, Jazmin M Saunders, Saunders Conjugal Society and others
Defendant: International Hospitality Management, Inc, International Hospitality Enterprises, Inc., H. R. Properties, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
Ortiz-Soto et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv01528
Plaintiff: MARIA ORTIZ-SOTO, Liz Hernandez-Soto and Maria H. Ortiz-Soto
Defendant: United States of America and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
United States of America v. $11,676.00 in U.S. Currency et al
as 3:2022cv01456
Plaintiff: USA and United States of America
Defendant: (A) $11,676.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY;, (B) WHITE I-PHONE 12 PRO MAX, IMEI: 354741660136418;, (C) GRAY I-PHONE 12 PRO MAX, IMEI: 354703751610677; and others
Debtor In Possession: (J)GOLD, I-PHONE 12, IMEI: 354245339595368,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
Salehmohammed et al v. Sea Ventures, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv01376
Plaintiff: Mohammed Salehmohammed, Shahanaz Mouradaly, Mohammed H. Salehmohammed and others
Defendant: Sea Ventures, Inc., John and Jane, Insurance Companies ABC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Robles-Figueroa v. Presbyterian Community Hospital, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01361
Plaintiff: Keila Robles Figueroa and Keila Robles-Figueroa
Defendant: Presbyterian Community Hospital, Inc. or alternatively, John Doe Corporation, d/b/a Presbyterian Community Hospital, Dr. Juan C. Castaner Barcel, Mary Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Thillet-Torres v. Dorado Health, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01313
Plaintiff: Dianeliz Thillet Torres and Dianeliz Thillet-Torres
Defendant: Dorado Health, Inc. or alternatively, John Doe Corporation d/b/a Manati Medical Center, Dr. Yolisa Suarez Ortiz, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Genuine Rolex 18k Solid Rose Gold Watch, GMT Master II Design et al
as 3:2022cv01223
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: GENUINE ROLEX 18K SOLID ROSE GOLD WATCH, GMT MASTER II DESIGN WITH SOLID ROSE GOLD OYSTER BRACELET REF. 126715. GOLD CONDITION., GENUINE ROLEX MEN'S18K YACHTMASTER II ALL YELLOW GOLD WATCH, WHITE DIAL, CERAMIC BLUE BEZEL OYSTER BRACELET, WITH DOUBLE CLASP. MODEL NUMBER# 116688, SERIAL NUMBER H44V7303 INCLUDES ORIGINAL, GENUINE ROLEX 18K SOLID ROSE GOLD AND STAINLESSSTEEL WATCH, YACHTMASTER II DESIGN REF. 116681, SERIAL NUMBER# 5538L503, WHITE DIAL WITH BLUE COLORED CERAMIC BEZEL, INCLUDING WARRANTY CARD, ORIGIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?