Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Caplan v. J&P AUTOMOTIVE & POWER BRAKE SERVICE, INC. et al
as 0:2023cv60480
Plaintiff: Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant: J&P AUTOMOTIVE & POWER BRAKE SERVICE, INC. and TRINITY WAREHOUSING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Rambarath v. J P Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 9:2022cv80400
Plaintiff: Christendath Rambarath
Defendant: J P Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Gonzalez v. J & P Tiles Inc., et al
as 1:2018cv22332
Plaintiff: Luis Gonzalez
Defendant: J & P Tiles Inc., Juan F Gronlier and Luis Gronlier
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv21106
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv14391
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv22633
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Oakley v. J. P. Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 9:2012cv80702
Plaintiff: Thomas J. Oakley
Defendant: J. P. Morgan Chase & Co. and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al v. Marquez
as 1:2009cv22873
Plaintiff: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and J. P. Morgan Securities Inc.
Defendant: Michael A. Marquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Type: Contract None
Arroyave v. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A. et al
as 1:2009cv20031
Plaintiff: Luis Angel Arroyave
Defendant: Washington Mutual Bank, F.A. and J. P. Morgan Chase & Co.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Caban v. J P Morgan Chase & Co.
as 0:2008cv60910
Plaintiff: Ann Marie Caban
Defendant: J P Morgan Chase & Co.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?