Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Jenkins v. Shakes et al
as 1:2023cv00115
Petitioner:
Willis Earl Jenkins, Jr.
Respondent:
Division 4 Judge Shakes, Shakes and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Nunn
as 4:2022cv00036
Petitioner:
Brandon L Jenkins
Respondent:
Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jenkins v. Executive Director of CDOC et al
as 1:2020cv01013
Respondent:
Executive Director of CDOC and LaVista Correctional Facility Warden
Petitioner:
Owdia Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Jenkins v. Allbaugh
as 4:2019cv00184
Defendant:
Joe Allbaugh
Petitioner:
David Michael Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jenkins et al v. Reynolds et al
as 2:2016cv01008
Plaintiff:
Mary C. Jenkins, Konna C. Oviatt, Edson Gardner and others
Defendant:
William Reynolds , Shaun Chapoose , Edred Secakuku and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Love v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 5:2014cv03195
Petitioner:
Leslie Love
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice, United States Parole Commission, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jenkins v. Roberts et al
as 5:2013cv03044
Petitioner:
Kerry D. Jenkins
Respondent:
Ray Roberts and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Martin et al
as 5:2013cv00230
Petitioner:
Michael C Jenkins
Respondent:
Terry Martin and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. State of Colorado
as 1:2011cv03251
Petitioner:
Gregory Jenkins
Respondent:
State of Colorado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jenkins v. Miller
as 4:2009cv00730
Petitioner:
Brandon Lamont Jenkins
Respondent:
David Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
