Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00793
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Briggs v. Jones et al
as 6:2015cv00016
Plaintiff:
David Derrill Briggs
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Bruce Howard, Paula Inge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Federal Transfer Center et al
as 5:2014cv01298
Plaintiff:
Ardell Levert Jenkins
Defendant:
Federal Transfer Center, Federal Tranfer Center Correctional Officers, United States Marshal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437
Jenkins v. Federal Transfer Center Medical Staff et al
as 5:2014cv01246
Plaintiff:
Ardell L Jenkins
Defendant:
Federal Transfer Center Medical Staff, B Dawkins, FNU Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Grady County Jail et al
as 5:2014cv01259
Plaintiff:
Ardell L Jenkins
Defendant:
Grady County Jail, Grady County Jail Correctional Officers and Grady County Jail Medical Staff and Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Briggs v. Jones et al
as 5:2014cv01183
Plaintiff:
David Derrill Briggs
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Bruce Howard, Paula Inge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. United States of America
as 5:2014cv01087
Movant:
Steven Dewayne Jenkins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jenkins v. Martin et al
as 5:2013cv00230
Petitioner:
Michael C Jenkins
Respondent:
Terry Martin and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jaquez v. Jones et al
as 5:2011cv01406
Plaintiff:
Henry Joseph Jaquez
Defendant:
Justin Jones, C Chester, Rick Whitten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Campa et al
as 5:2010cv00943
Plaintiff:
Roger Foy Jenkins
Defendant:
Victor Campa, Ivan Powell, Carla Osborne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
