Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Jenkins v. Zavala et al
as 2:2023cv01201
Plaintiff:
Daniel Loren Jenkins
Defendant:
Nurse Zavala, Dorothy Wettlaufer, Ms. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Peters et al
as 2:2023cv01202
Plaintiff:
Daniel Loren Jenkins
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Rob Persson, Erin Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Rosenblum et al
as 2:2023cv00626
Plaintiff:
Daniel Loren Jenkins
Defendant:
Ellen F. Rosenblum, Colette Peters, Rob Persson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
as 2:2022cv00950
Petitioner:
Daniel Loren Jenkins
Respondent:
Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. MCDC et al
as 3:2021cv01331
Plaintiff:
Carl T. Jenkins
Defendant:
MCDC, Captain Wheeler, Sheriff Michael Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02103
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jenkins v. Myrick
as 2:2018cv00100
Petitioner:
Michael W Jenkins
Respondent:
John Myrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Kelly
as 6:2017cv01300
Petitioner:
Charles Jenkins
Respondent:
Brandon Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trumble v. Klamath Falls City Police Department et al
as 1:2017cv00502
Defendant:
Daniel Banderas, Isa Daibes, Lt. Jack Daniel and others
Plaintiff:
Michael John Trumble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
as 2:2017cv00375
Respondent:
Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
Petitioner:
Michael W. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
