Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Jenkins v. Ellis et al
as 3:2017cv00169
Defendant:
Judge James R. Ellis and Multnomah County
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Amsberry
as 2:2016cv02314
Respondent:
Brigitte Amsberry
Petitioner:
Michael W. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Beatty et al
as 3:2016cv02274
Defendant:
Judge C. Beatty and Judge Mercedes F. Diez
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Myrick
as 2:2016cv01534
Petitioner:
Michael W. Jenkins
Unknown:
Lisa Hay and Lynn David Larsen
Respondent:
John Myrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Myrick
as 2:2016cv01402
Petitioner:
Michael W. Jenkins
Respondent:
John Myrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Myrick
as 2:2016cv00247
Petitioner:
Daniel Loren Jenkins
Unknown:
Lisa Hay and Lynn David Larsen
Respondent:
John Myrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
French v. U.S. Dept of Justice et al
as 2:2015cv02291
Plaintiff:
Tony French
Defendant:
Elijah F. Jenkins and U.S. Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Nooth
as 2:2015cv02209
Petitioner:
Richard Anthony Jenkins
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Nooth et al
as 2:2015cv00558
Defendant:
Bristol, A. Clements, Joe Elliot-Blakeslee and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Anthony Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Board of Parole Post-Prison Supervision
as 2:2014cv00770
Respondent:
Board of Parole Post-Prison Supervision
Petitioner:
Michael W. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
